Shahar Peer vs Kimiko Date Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L L W W L L L
Form
L L L W W W L L L LHead-2-Head: Peer 1 - 2 Date
They have played 7 sets in total, with Peer winning 3 and Date winning 4. The last match between Peer and Date was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 17-01-2013, Second, Hard with Kimiko Date getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Shahar Peer | 1 |
| Kimiko Date | 2 |
Australian Open - Melbourne(17-01-2013)
6
2
7
5
| Peer | Stats | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 11 | Highest Rank | 46 |
| 37 | Age | 54 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 9 | Titles | 10 |
| 58% (388-277) | Career Total W/L | 56% (217-173) |
| $2,894,734 | Career Prize Money | $576,029 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 2 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kenin VS Potapova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sakkari VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-5 |
Stats 
Kimiko Date
Player
Shahar Peer
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
47%
(
25 of
53)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
50%
(
36 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
| 3-6 7-6(5) 7-5 |
Stats
Kimiko Date
Player
Shahar Peer
68%
(
77 of
113)
1st Serve %
76%
(
87 of
115)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
51 of
87)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
46%
(
52 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
55 of
115)
116
Total Points Won
112
|
||||
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats
Shahar Peer
Player
Kimiko Date
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 36 | Games Won | 34 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:30:17 | Average Match Time | 1:30:17 |
| 69% (162/235) | 1st Serve % | 68% (159/234) |
| 56% (90/162) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (84/159) |
| 42% (31/73) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (35/75) |
| 42% (16/38) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (15/33) |
| 49% (115/234) | Return Points Win % | 49% (114/235) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Shahar Peer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktorija Golubic
Player
Shahar Peer
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paula Cristina Goncalves
Player
Shahar Peer
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
48%
(
29 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Kateryna Volodko
Player
Shahar Peer
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Shahar Peer
Player
Tena Lukas
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
91)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Shahar Peer
Player
Valeria Gorlats
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
33%
(
19 of
58)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Ipek Soylu
Player
Shahar Peer
57%
(
58 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
1
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
4
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
45 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kristyna Pliskova
Player
Shahar Peer
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
12
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
3
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jana Cepelova
Player
Shahar Peer
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronica Cepede Royg
Player
Shahar Peer
74%
(
62 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
10
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Glushko
Player
Shahar Peer
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Kimiko Date Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandra Krunic
Player
Kimiko Date
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve %
52%
(
17 of
33)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
6 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
51
Total Points Won
13
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emina Bektas
Player
Kimiko Date
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
11
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
3-6 6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Usue Maitane Arconada
Player
Kimiko Date
54%
(
47 of
87)
1st Serve %
76%
(
54 of
71)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
39 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
90
Total Points Won
68
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sohyun Park
Player
Kimiko Date
48%
(
16 of
33)
1st Serve %
79%
(
31 of
39)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
13 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
42
Total Points Won
30
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Lin Zhu
Player
Kimiko Date
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
81%
(
43 of
53)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amandine Hesse
Player
Kimiko Date
60%
(
59 of
99)
1st Serve %
76%
(
74 of
98)
8
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
41 of
74)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
43 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
98)
104
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chang Liu
Player
Kimiko Date
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
74%
(
60 of
81)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (388/277) | Win/Loss | 56% (217/173) |
| 56% (855/668) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (493/404) |
| 52% (7235/6580) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4322/3949) |
| 60% (247/165) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (142/114) |
| 58% (84/62) | Clay Win/Loss | 30% (9/21) |
| 59% (39/27) | Indoor Hard W/L | 71% (56/23) |
| 44% (18/23) | Grass Win/Loss | 40% (10/15) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 551 | Aces Total | 195 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1575 | Total Double Faults | 847 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 498.2 | Average Opponent Rank | 571.56 |
| 65% (21212/32646) | 1st Serve % | 67% (12842/19242) |
| 61% (12882/21212) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (7495/12842) |
| 44% (5081/11441) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2892/6400) |
| 48% (2024/4236) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1115/2323) |
| 46% (15135/32818) | Return Points Win % | 45% (8811/19462) |
| 57% (60/45) | Slam W/L | 26% (10/29) |
| 55% (85/70) | Masters W/L | 46% (27/32) |
| 62% (21/13) | Cups W/L | 70% (7/3) |
| 59% (189/129) | Main Tour W/L | 47% (60/68) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (33/20) | Challenger W/L | 72% (108/41) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 100% (5/0) |
| 58% (384/659) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (215/381) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 57% (71/125) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (45/93) |
| 58% (114/195) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (62/119) |
| 87% (370/321) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (217/184) |
| 13% (370/49) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (217/32) |
| 23% (295/67) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (172/33) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
